FortuneTiger.io publishes independent explanations about the Fortune Tiger game, fake platforms, payment problems and casino account issues. This policy describes how topics are selected, how claims are checked and how the site separates game, operator and payment responsibilities.
Editorial purpose
The purpose of FortuneTiger.io is to help users understand a specific game, account or payment situation.
Each page is built around one clear question, such as:
- how Fortune Tiger works;
- what its published RTP means;
- how to identify a fake app;
- why a deposit is missing;
- why a withdrawal remains pending;
- which company controls an account restriction.
The site does not turn narrow problems into general casino guides.
Topics we publish
FortuneTiger.io covers:
- official Fortune Tiger mechanics;
- PG Soft and the identity of the game developer;
- RTP, RNG, respins and multipliers;
- demo and real-money differences;
- fake websites, apps and APK files;
- missing deposits;
- pending, rejected or missing withdrawals;
- blocked or restricted casino accounts;
- the roles of operators, banks, wallets and payment providers.
Topics we do not publish
FortuneTiger.io does not publish:
- casino rankings;
- bonus-led rankings or comparison pages that treat bonus size as a quality score;
- “best casino” pages;
- guaranteed winning claims;
- betting systems;
- signal groups;
- methods for predicting RNG results;
- claims about the best time to play;
- instructions for bypassing verification or geographic restrictions;
- advice to recover losses through additional gambling.
How topics are selected
A topic is selected when it represents a distinct user situation that requires a separate answer.
Before publication, the page must identify:
- what has already happened;
- what the user needs to understand or do;
- which entity controls the issue;
- which facts require verification;
- which related information is outside the page’s scope.
Entity separation
FortuneTiger.io keeps the following entities separate:
| Entity | Typical responsibility |
|---|---|
| PG Soft | Develops and supplies the Fortune Tiger game software |
| Fortune Tiger | Represents the game-round logic and outcomes produced by the software |
| Casino operator | Manages accounts, balances, KYC, deposits and withdrawals |
| Payment provider | Transfers money between the operator and financial institutions |
| Bank or mobile wallet | May approve, delay, reject, return or receive a transaction |
| Fake platform | May use the Fortune Tiger name without a verifiable connection to PG Soft or a legitimate operator |
For this reason, the site does not normally state that “Fortune Tiger blocked an account” or “Fortune Tiger delayed a withdrawal”. Those actions are usually controlled by the operator or payment system.
Source standards
FortuneTiger.io prefers primary and directly relevant sources.
These include:
- official PG Soft pages and game documents;
- technical reports and recognised testing laboratories;
- official casino-operator terms for operator-specific claims;
- gambling regulators and government bodies;
- official bank and payment-provider documentation;
- official app-store and device-security documentation.
Forums, complaint sites, videos and social media may reveal recurring user reports. They are not treated as proof of ownership, licensing, game mechanics, payment status or wrongdoing.
Levels of certainty
Articles distinguish between:
- confirmed fact — supported by a primary or authoritative source;
- likely explanation — consistent with the available evidence but not confirmed for the individual case;
- possible cause — one of several explanations requiring further checking;
- user allegation — a reported claim that has not been independently verified;
- unverified claim — information that reliable sources do not confirm.
Claims we do not invent
FortuneTiger.io does not invent or estimate:
- RTP figures;
- licences;
- operator ownership;
- withdrawal limits;
- payment-processing times;
- game versions;
- support details;
- app ownership;
- reasons for an account restriction;
- legal status in a particular jurisdiction.
When a fact depends on a specific operator, payment provider or country, the page should say so.
Article structure
Guides normally follow this sequence:
user situation → system state → possible causes → how to verify → what to do next
The useful answer should appear near the top. Pages use short paragraphs and descriptive headings so that individual passages remain understandable when quoted separately.
Editorial independence
FortuneTiger.io is not a casino, gambling operator, payment provider, bank or regulator.
The site does not accept deposits, provide player accounts, distribute APK files or process withdrawals.
Editorial conclusions are not changed to promise winnings, encourage additional gambling or present an unverified platform as legitimate.
Operator offers, affiliate links and first-hand tests
FortuneTiger.io may link to third-party operators and may receive affiliate compensation from some links. Commercial relationships must be disclosed and must not determine factual conclusions, operator ordering or the wording of a safety or payment diagnosis.
Until an operator feature or promotion has been tested directly by FortuneTiger.io, it is described as an operator-advertised or operator-published claim and linked to the responsible source where practical. First-hand observations are labelled separately and include the operator, test date, relevant region or account state and the exact behaviour observed. See the Affiliate Disclosure and First-hand Testing Methodology.
Responsible wording
Content must not imply that:
- losses can be recovered through continued play;
- increasing the stake improves future results;
- RTP predicts an individual session;
- previous spins reveal the next RNG result;
- a payment is guaranteed after another deposit;
- verification or payment rules should be bypassed.
Updates and corrections
Pages may be updated when:
- an official source changes;
- a game document is updated;
- a source link stops working;
- a factual error is identified;
- a passage is unclear or too broad;
- new evidence changes the appropriate conclusion.
Material corrections should be based on verifiable evidence rather than unsupported requests to remove accurate information.
Contact and correction requests
A correction request should include:
- the URL of the affected page;
- the statement believed to be inaccurate;
- the proposed correction;
- a reliable source supporting the change.
See the sources and fact-checking policy and corrections policy for further details.